Many artists (even very good, mature artists) seem to believe that “anime” is intrinsically childish or lesser than more “realistic” styles, and I for one would like to speak to you all about this, because I believe it creates bitterness between artists where there ought to be comaraderie, and keeps people from learning from any and all sources. Not to mention, when “realistic” artists condescend “anime” artists, it just causes the one being talked down to or insulted to mulishly refuse to explore anything other than their favorite manga styles, which is detrimental, or it may push them away from a style they used to enjoy, which is also detrimental.

Many artist choose to view artwork done in an “anime” style as invalid.

I think this is a childish point of view (having outgrown that mode of thought once I reached college) There is no such thing as an invalid mode of artistic creation. Artwork can be as “popular” as it wants to be and it will not be invalidated. The only thing that can make an artwork not art is if the artist refuses to develop his or her own style, leaning instead on the style of an artist they admire.

Taking inspiration from another artist is one thing, using their style because you fear to step outside of it is another.

When you claim that a style isn’t “art”, you alienate the artist and miss a learning oppourtunity. Whether you lean towards the East or the West, you can learn from any artist and any genre of art, and you will often be surprised by the sources of inspiration that shape your own work.